| the G has a very attractive interior IMO, different from ours but still really sharp I think---subjective the G has exterior styling that is much more unique and not so "me too" with the "peeled back" head and taillights of the 350, along with the trendy bubble butt, I like the G's styling almost as much as the Z32---subjective the G has (while it is new) a badass warranty---objective...for now every road test I have seen of G's are nearly identical to every 350 I have read, and the stock numbers are nearly the same as the Z32TT the differences are not even worth arguing when you are talking about driving on public roads, which is where likely 99.9% of these cars spent 99.9% of their time---objective the G comes equipped far better than any Z32 ever did, and it should considering it is 2005, better airbags, better gizmos, etc etc.---objective I think our cars are superior because of the intangibles, the styling, the potential at relatively low expense. The G is so close to being great (as far as stock versions are concerned, please no apples vs oranges), but it has that "but" that is like a super hot swimsuit model you find out wants you for a sex slave BUT she has chlamydia and never brushes her teeth.
My biggest gripe about the new cars is that even if I had the money for one, I wouldnt buy one because I absolutely have to have a roof option on my sportscar, and sunroofs dont count, T-tops or targa or forget about it. That alone would guarantee my money being spent on a corvette before I bought a G or 350. I am in the camp that says the G should have been the new Z.
 |
